![]() |
||
|
About Ralph Metzner Metzner Alchemical Divination Training
|
from
the Introduction: Amazonian Vine of Visions Ayahuasca is an
hallucinogenic Amazonian plant concoction, that has been used by native Indian
and mestizo shamans in Peru, Colombia and Ecuador for healing and divination
for hundreds, perhaps thousands of years. It is known by various names in the
different tribes, including caapi, natema, mihi and yajé.
The name ayahuasca is from the Quechua language: huasca means
"vine" or "liana" and aya means "souls" or "dead people" or "spirits".
Thus "vine of the dead", "vine of the souls" or "vine of the spirits" would
all be appropriate English translations. It is however slightly misleading as
a name, since the vine Banisteriopsis caapi is only one of two essential
ingredients in the hallucinogenic brew, the other one being the leafy plant Psychotria viridis, which contain the powerful psychoactive dimethyltryptamine
(DMT). It is the DMT, derivatives of which are also present in various other
natural hallucinogens, including the magic mushroom of Mexico, that provides
visionary experiences and thus access to the realm of spirits and the souls
of deceased ancestors. But DMT is not orally active, being metabolized by the
stomach enzyme monoamine oxidase (MAO). Certain chemicals in the vine inhibit
the action of MAO and are therefore referred to as MAO-inhibitors: -- their
presence in the brew makes the psychoactive principle available and allows it
to circulate through the bloodstream into the brain, where it triggers
the visionary access to otherworldly realms and beings. The details of this
remarkably sophisticated indigenous psychoactive drug-delivery system, and the
history of its discovery by science, will be described and explored in this
volume. Science and Experience - Toward an epistemology for the study of consciousness Western science in general and psychology in particular has never been comfortable with the study of the subjective side of life, with qualities of experience, purposes, intuitions, altered states or spiritual aspirations. Under the sway of the Newtonian-Cartesian mind-matter dichotomy, consciousness and experience were seen as belonging to the realm of religion, and science agreed to stay out of it. Later, as the ideological hold of the Church diminished and the materialist paradigm became paramount, consciousness and all subjective experience became even more firmly banished from scientific discourse. In the 19th century, the German social philosopher Wilhelm Dilthey attempted to establish the "mental sciences" (Geisteswissenschaften), on an equivalent footing to the "natural sciences" (Naturwissenschaften). This idea never really took hold in the English-speaking world. Instead, the social sciences (psychology, sociology, anthropology, political science) adopted and imitated the empirical observational and quantitative analytical methods of the natural sciences. In psychology, the only observations that qualified as "scientific" were observations of behavior -- to the extreme of B.F. Skinner's behaviorism, in which mental states were said to be in an unknowable "black box". Although the influence of strict behaviorism in psychology has waned in the latter half of the 20th century, the ideological commitment to a materialist worldview has not. In the leading paradigms of cognitive psychology or cognitive science (which includes brain sciences, computer modeling, information systems and the like) consciousenss is still treated as something to be explained (i.e. explained away) in the supposesdly more "real" terms of "neural nets", "brain circuits" and the like. In the latter half of the 19th century a European philosophical movement took a completely different and new approach to the study of consciousness. The German mathematician/philosopher Edmund Husserl (1859 - 1938) originally conceived of his phenomenology as an attempt to rescue philosophy and the quest for absolute knowledge from the "naturalism" and relativism of the newly arising experimental psychology. He criticized the psychophysical method of Wilhelm Wundt and G.T. Fechner as providing only correlations between subjective events and physical events, and ignoring the possibilities of "pre-understanding" of what consciousness was essentially. For Husserl, the abstract truths of mathematics are essences that are grasped by the mind directly, without relative or empirical observation. He proposed phenomenology as the method for directly arriving at essential and universal knowledge about the nature of consciousness and meaning, in part by clarifying the implicit pre-understandings that underlie other psychological approaches. A core concept of Husserl's phenomenology of consciousness is intentionality : consciousness is always intentional, always "of" or "about" something, always directed, like an arrow or a mathematical vector, toward some object of meaning. The objects that consciousness intends can be external, or they can be internal aspects of our own experience. Because intentional consciousness is always "constituting" the essential features of the various domains of existence, both external and internal, consciousness has a fundamental "ontological priority" -- it is the "supporting ground of reality". The focus on intention as the fundamental constituting attribute of consciousness is congruent with the emphasis on "set (and setting)" as the prime determinants of altered states. The ontological primacy of consciousness in Husserl's phenomenology is consistent with the worldview of the mystics in Eastern and Western traditions as well as the insights coming from profound altered states. A further innovative contribution to the phenomenology of consciousness was made by the French philosopher Maurice Merleau-Ponty (1908 - 1961). In his work, the focus of interest shifts from the subjective mind to the subjective body, or bodily experience (le corps propre). For Merleau-Ponty, perception is an inherently creative, participatory activity between the living body and its world. All subjectivity or consciousness presupposes our inherence in a corporeal world, a world that we perceive as having depth, intimacy and horizon. The ecophilosopher David Abram (1996) has shown how in many ways Merleau-Ponty's later thought, in his work The Visible and the Invisible, anticipates the deep ecologists and others who are looking to develop a new conscious awareness of our embeddedness in the world of Nature. The American philosopher William James (1842 - 1910) approached the psychology of consciousness in his characteristic multifarious manner. He may have been the first person to use the concept of "field" in talking about consciousness: human beings have "fields of consciousness", which are always complex, -- containing body sensations, sense impressions, memories, thoughts, feelings, desires and "determinations of the will", in fact "a teeming multiplicity of objects and relations". He made it clear that his famous "stream of thought" image actually meant not just thoughts, but images, sensations, feelings, etc. He wrote that the mind "seems to embrace a confederation of psychic entities," -- a statement that contemporary explorers of states of consciousness would readily relate to. In addition to multiplicity, James was greatly impressed by the selectivity of consciousness. In his Principles of Psychology he wrote, "The mind is at every stage a theatre of simultaneous possibilities. Consciousness consists in the comparison of these with each other, the selection of some and the suppression of the rest by the reinforcing and inhibiting agency of attention." (James, 1890/1952, p. 187). The self was the unifying principle in the multiple fields of consciousness, and the active, selective agency that expressed itself through its interests and the directing of attention. While drawing attention to the multiplicity and selectivity of ordinary consciousness and attention, James also explored the paranormal and mystical dimensions of consciousness, that usually lie outside the boundaries of personal or scientific interest. He pursued a life-long interest in the phenomena of sub-liminal consciousness, or "exceptional mental states", including those found in hypnotism, automatisms (e.g. somnambulism), hysteria, multiple personality, demoniacal possession, witchcraft, degeneration and genius. James's interest in unusual states of consciousness led him to experiment with nitrous oxide, or "laughing gas" as it was then known, an experience that reinforced his understanding of transrational states of consciousness. He wrote that the conclusion he drew from these early "psychedelic" experiences was "that our normal waking consciousness, rational consciousness as we call it, is but one special type of consciousness, while all about it, parted from it by the filmiest of screens, there lie potential forms of consciousness entirely different." (James, 1901/1958, p. 228) James wrote this statement in his The Varieties of Religious Experience, probably his most influential book. In it he explored with great discernment and eloquence the nature and significance of mystical or "conversion" experiences, by which he meant not only a person's change from one religion to another, but the process of attaining a sense of unity and the sacred dimension of life. In my book The Unfolding Self I adopted James' empirical, comparative approach to the study of transformative experience -- delineating the basic archetypal patterns of psychospiritual transformation. The present collection of accounts of experiences with ayahuasca stands in the same tradition of empirical phenomenology. It is only recently, in re-reading William James' writings on his philosophy of radical empiricism (James, 1912/1996) that I came to realize that this philosophy actually provides the epistemology of choice for the study of altered states of consciousness. Within the materialistic paradigm still ruling in scientific circles, any insights or learnings gained from dreams, trances, intuitions, mystical ecstasies or the like, would be seen as "purely subjective" and limited to those states, i.e. not having general applicability or "reality". The ASC (altered states of consciousness) paradigm is still considered marginal. The psychologist Charles Tart in an essay on "state-specific sciences" attempted to break the conceptual stranglehold of this paradigm by suggesting that observations made in a given state of consciousness could only be verified or replicated in that same state. This solution seems theoretically valid, but attended with practical difficulties. William James started with the basic assumption of the empirical (which means "experience-based") approach: all knowledge is derived from experience. Die Erfahrung ist die Mutter der Wissenschaft as the German saying goes -- "experience is the mother of science". James writes: I give the name of 'radical empiricism' to my Weltanschauung. ... To be radical an empiricism must neither admit into its construction any element that is not directly experienced, nor exclude from them any element that is directly experienced. For such a philosophy, the relations that connect experiences must themselves be experienced relations, and any kind of relation experienced must be accounted as 'real' as anything else in the system. (James, 1912/1996, p. 42) This view can provide a philosophical foundation for a scientific psychology of consciousness. All knowledge must be based on observation, i.e. experience; so far this view coincides with the empiricism of the natural and social sciences. It's the second statement that is truly 'radical' and that explains why James included religious and paranormal experiences in his investigations. The experiences in modified states of consciousness are currently excluded from materialistic, reductionistic science. They would not be excluded in a radical empiricism.
|
|
Green Earth Foundation Ralph Metzner PO Box 327 El Verano, CA 95433 |
||